Why real innovation needs products, teams, commercial models and operating discipline, not just labs, hackathons and a wall of sticky notes.
Most organisations have far more innovation activity than innovation output. Labs, hackathons, accelerators, innovation days, strategy offsites. The calendar is full. The product portfolio is not.
The problem is never a shortage of ideas. It is a shortage of the operating discipline it takes to turn an idea into something that works in the real world.
Innovation theatre has a familiar shape. A nicely branded space, a programme name, a process that moves ideas through stages of increasing polish. Everyone is enthusiastic. The sponsor turns up to the showcase. The outputs look promising.
Then the quarterly review lands. The "innovation projects" are not making money. They are not in the core business. Nobody owns their commercial performance. They fade, and the next cohort kicks off. I have sat in that review more than once.
Building a venture, whether inside a corporate, a government entity or as a standalone startup, needs five things innovation programmes rarely provide in full.
A clear commercial hypothesis: not "this technology is interesting" but "this customer will buy this product at this price for this reason."
Product discipline: the ability to decide what to build, build it, learn from real users and iterate, repeatedly, not once.
Operational ownership: a team that wakes up accountable for the venture's performance, not for the innovation programme's metrics.
Governance that enables speed: decision-making that lets a venture move fast while keeping the organisation informed enough to stay comfortable.
Capital patience: the recognition that ventures take time to become viable, and that killing them at the first hard quarter destroys the investment in the ones that would have made it.
This is unglamorous work. It is also the only kind that produces ventures that last. Innovation only counts when it survives contact with operations.
Alex Collins
Co-founder & COO at RAI Digital & Infinite PL · Ex-EY Consulting Partner · Writing on agentic AI, venture building, logistics platforms and transformation leadership.
One honest read every fortnight on what agentic AI is doing to consulting, and what to do about it. For people moving from advice to outcomes, rebuilding a firm, or done buying decks. No hype, no fluff.
Boards are being handed AI usage numbers as a progress report, and three studies this year show readiness can fall while adoption climbs, because the business change is not keeping pace with the technology.
The argument about AI and consulting has been about the bottom of the model, and the change that matters is happening at the other end, where the hand-off between the people who decide and the people who deliver is running out of reasons to exist.
The AI headcount debate has been asking the wrong question, and the answer to the right one is a place where people are allowed to be wrong.
